The well-publicized case of Marty Tankleff
gets a fresh look in Sunday's New York Times. The New York man is serving 50 years to life for killing his parents. The Times story says a detective tricked Tankleff into a confession
by saying his father fingered him as the killer on his death bed, suggesting Tankleff blocked the memory of the attack. In addition, new evidence supports Tankleff's accusation that his father's business partner was behind the murders.
The paper also runs a cover story critical of two courts hearing appeals from death row inmates
in Texas. Over the last decade, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled against prosecutors in all six appeals brought by inmates on death row in Texas. The Times finds the actions of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in ignoring prosecutorial misconduct and past court decisions are largely responsible.
The Court of Criminal Appeals, which is the highest court in Texas hearing criminal cases, has been deemed the worst in the state by one magazine. The story cites one high-profile case in which a prison inmate serving 99 years for the rape and murder of a 16-year-old girl was cleared by two rounds of DNA testing. Yet the criminal appeals court voted 6-3 to let his conviction stand. It took George W. Bush, of all people, to grant the man clemency.
Such cases have led one justice to use a $20 million grant to foster a network of innocence projects at law schools around the state.